Social media flow chart for comms pros

* 09/01/21 Social media flow chart – updated for 2021!

When I first posted this chart 7 years ago (and more than 52,000 downloads ago!), I had no idea how popular it would be.

People have sent me tweets showing photos of it pinned on office walls, and still people regularly tell me it’s be useful.

Cheers to everyone who has shared and used it. 

Read ‘Dealing with negative social media comments’ for more advice on answering your audience on social media, or just read the chart below!




Social media flow chart for responding to your audience

When going on holiday and handing over a social media account or talking to a new member of staff, it can be handy to show a rough a ‘guide to responding to social media comments’.

Years of being a social media manager, and running social media training workshops, for comms pros helped me devise my own guide, which I share with you in this post.

Hopefully, you or someone in your team will find this social media flow chart handy.

If you think it’s useful, you can download a PDF.

social media response flowchart














Share this chart with your Twitter network: tweet about this chart.

I have split up the kinds of comment you’ll get into five categories – complaint, attack, query, compliment, and chat.

If someone has gone to the trouble of talking to your brand online, this helps you to consider what response you should reply with (it’s SOCIAL media after all).

03/06/14: Note – I forgot to say, this image is issued under a ‘steal, modify, or scribble on’ licence (that I just made up).  If you have a use for it, go ahead – it’s a present from me!

If you like this chart, maybe you might like one of these social media courses. Whether it’s how to increase engagement with your Facebook posts, writing a social media strategy or getting prepared for a crisis – these workshops and online courses will have you covered.

29 thoughts on “Social media flow chart for comms pros

  1. I found this guide really useful, particularly the area when you acknowledge that is OK to say that we don’t know the answer yet but are working on get it.

    It makes me think as well of the 5 types of active participants in the social media ecosystem such as 1. Creators, 2. Critics, 3. Collectors, 4. Joiners and 5. Spectators suggested on this article: Hanna, R., Rohm, A. & Crittenden, V.L., 2011. We’re all connected: The power of the social media ecosystem. Business Horizons, 54(3), pp.265–273. Available at: [Accessed January 21,

    Guides like this helps us realise that engage in social media is not as daunting as some people might think it is.

    1. Thanks Ailin, so glad it’s useful!

      I was on social media patrol for a council for years and I rarely knew the answers off the top of my head.

      A county is an interesting and complex place and queries in a day could range from ‘who’s going to remove the dead badger off the road’ to ‘how can I borrow a wheelchair for a while while my mum has broken her leg?’

      Also, rants and insults and lots of support and chat about the great things that were happening out there and even the odd compliment from our switched-on, friendly and passionate communities.

      I think the key to being good at responding is:
      * keeping people updated on what you do and don’t know;
      * having good relationships with the people in your organisation who know who does what;
      * and charming people into dropping what they’re working on to help you get accurate and quick answers!

      The internal stuff is a trickier than ‘the public’ I reckon!

  2. That’s clear, and sensible, and is the type of protocol that would help us in Bradford. I have just one question. Are you suggesting replying to everything? There are times when we have received rants, or repeated criticisms from persistent individuals. I’m not convinced such people always want/expect a reply (regardless of whether our social media team have the capacity to do so).

    1. Thanks, glad you like it! I am suggesting that effort is made to answer anything and everything. I know that resources, especially in local government, are scarce but in most instances aiming to respond is do-able. I work on the principle that answers = respect.

      I don’t expect agreement on this but here’s why I think so:

      *Angry people ranting may well have started out polite but got increasingly frustrated by being moved from one person in your organisation and other services to the next, and end up feeling like they’re being ignored or messed around. It happens a lot. We don’t always know what they’ve been though and have a chance to try to satisfy them.

      *Social media shouldn’t be too different to other customer facing services and we wouldn’t encourage, say, a receptionist in council offices to stay silent or walk away if somebody visited and said something critical or rhetorical. A ‘your comment has been noted’ would do in many cases as a minimum.

      *In a local government context, no person is more important than another – just because someone is critical it doesn’t mean they should be treated differently to someone who isn’t critical.

      *My personal experience is that when those who are most frustrated get answers they are satisfied with, they become louder supporters of what you do than those who were always satisfied. I wonder if there is a psychological explanation for this? Or perhaps the people I’m thinking of in this case just don’t hold a grudge. One or two ‘persistent’ people said a fond farewell when I left the council I worked for recently, they appreciated the efforts my team made even if they’re still a bit iffy about the answers!

      It’s hard not to be biased and bring your personal values to work though. The posts I didn’t answer tended to be racist or misogynist. In my personal life I like swearing so that never bothered me but I was afraid if I answered bigots I may venture into ‘banging my head against a brick wall’ territory.

      I await opposite views and convincing arguments otherwise!

      1. Replying to everything is something I’d encourage as a strategy – agree that it engenders a professional image, and can frequently disarm people who are angry or frustrated.

        It personalises your service – one of the biggest criticisms of councils are that they are faceless bureaucracies. That’s an accusation that’s a lot harder to make when someone’s comments don’t disappear into a black hole and are in fact answered, swiftly and in a friendly way by a real person with a name. A response shows that someone is listening, and that the commenter is part of a conversation. It also shows that they’re accountable for what they say – not just daubing something on a wall or shouting something over a parapet and walking off.

        That said, it’s clear that there are times when people are just spoiling for a fight no matter what you say, or have a grudge, or a problem that far exceeds your remit in being able to deal with. In those cases, my advice is that you should respond only once at most, and your response should ideally be shorter than theirs.
        Sounds an odd rule doesn’t it?
        My thinking is that it presents them with the dilemma of whether to push on, demanding more and more, appearing more “ranty” than before, or to acquiesce.

        Ignore subsequent comments if they continue to be unreasonable, and they’ll appear exactly that – unreasonable. An economically written response will do wonders in making you look like you’re just indulging someone with an axe to grind, but don’t intend to be drawn in. Get involved in a protracted to and fro, and you’re down on their level. In these situations, it’s not the individual you need to convince of your professionalism (it doesn’t matter what you say to them), it’s actually everyone else who’s reading.

  3. By and large I am in total agreement with you (and James) and I’m also nodding my head. When I started this job last year I was surprised by just how many comments and questions on social media were being left without reply. I have helped to address that, and our social media team now respond to far more than previously (I used a similar comparison to yours about the receptionist – if someone rang our contact centre they wouldn’t be hung up on – social media customers should not be disadvantaged due to the channel they chose to use).

    The people who we don’t respond to are mostly those spoiling for a fight, as James puts it, who have repeatedly been making similar comments over and over. But our non-reply policy (with a small p) extends further than that, to include rants, if those rants don’t have a genuine enquiry hidden in them.

    I don’t want to say much more on this public space, because what I say could be construed as critical of citizens, colleagues, or my organisation, and that is not my intention. But it would be interesting to continue this debate over a cuppa sometime. 🙂

    I’m sure there is a psychological explanation for “when those who are most frustrated get answers they are satisfied with, they become louder supporters of what you do than those who were always satisfied.” There’s certainly something very powerful about saying “Hey, thanks forgetting in touch. I hear what you’re saying. This is how things lie.”

  4. Thanks for posting this, and hope you don’t mind, but I have shared this with a small group of local authority staff who manage various social media accounts in Torbay as a great example of how to respond to tweets/comments. It was greatly received!

  5. Thanks for this, and for the comments – really helpful information. I work as a Communications Officer at a Housing Association and I know the housing team are worried about getting tirades of abuse and how to react to it, so I’ve just shared this with them!

  6. This chart demystifies a common issue for so many communicators on social. The bottom line is, it’s OK to say you don’t know the answer and are taking the time to find out. It’s all about giving due attention on social media – and being honest!

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.